Tell the California Assembly Appropriations Committee to vote NO on anti-BDS (AB 2844) Bill

NoOn2844

Assemblymember Richard Bloom from Santa Monica introduced the “California Combating the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions of Israel Act” (AB 2844)  to the California State Assembly last month.  This bill seeks to block campaigns critical of  the Israeli government’s illegal occupation of Palestine by withholding contracts with California state and local government agencies from companies, like Veolia,  that have withdrawn from doing business in Israel because of BDS campaigns. While the bill does not forbid BDS campaigns (that would violate our first amendment rights of free speech) it does interfere with BDS campaigns which the supreme court has ruled are protected by the constitution.

AB 2844 may go before the Appropriations Committee as early as May11th.  It has already passed the Administrative and Judiciary committees over staff objections to the constitutionality of the bill.  The Arab American Civic Council has joined a coalition of 120 organizations working to defeat the bill. We need people to let their State Assembly members  know that they oppose AB 2844. Even if your Assemblymember is not included in the following list of Appropriation Committee members, call or write them. We need to let Sacramento know that a large number of people oppose AB 2844.

Here is the link of AB 2844 to read what is stated:

http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201520160AB2844

List of Assemblymembers that we need to tell to vote NO on AB 2844 (“California Combating the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions of Israel Act”) when it goes to the Assembly Appropriations Committee on Wednesday, May 11th:

Lorena Gonzales (D-San Diego)
evan.mclaughlin@asm.ca.gov
(916) 319-2080

Frank Bigelow (R-Jackson)
katie.masingale@asm.ca.gov
916-319-2005

Richard Bloom (D-Santa Monica)
guy.strahl@asm.ca.gov
(916) 319-2050

Susan Bonilla (D-Concord)
sonja.palladino@asm.ca.gov
916-319-2014

Rob Bonta (D-Oakland)
evan.corder@asm.ca.gov
916-319-2018

Ian Calderon (D-City of Industry)
ryan.pierini@asm.ca.gov
916-319-2057

Tom Daly (D- Anaheim)
david.miller@asm.ca.gov
916-319-2069

Ling-Ling Chang (R-Brea)
christopher.finarelli@asm.ca.gov
916-319-2055

James Gallagher (R-Chico)
katja.townsend@asm.ca.gov
916-319-2003

Eduardo Garcia (D-Coachella)
emmanuel.martinez@asm.ca.gov
916-319-2056

Chris Holden (D-Pasadena)
nicholas.liedtke@asm.ca.gov
916-319-2041

Roger Hernandez (D-West Covina)
erica.martinez@asm.ca.gov
(916) 319-2048

Brian Jones (R-Santee)
ted.blanchard@asm.ca.gov
(916) 319-2071

Bill Quirk (D-Hayward)
tomasa.duenas@asm.ca.gov
916-319-2020

Jay Obernolte (R-Hesperia)
joshua.hoover@asm.ca.gov
916-319-2033

Miguel Santiago (D-Los Angeles)
jaspreet.johl@asm.ca.gov
916-319-2053

Susan Talamantes-Eggman (D-Stockton)
gustavo.medina@asm.ca.gov
(916) 319-2013

Don Wagner (D-Tustin)
david.scheidt@asm.ca.gov
(916) 319-2068

Shirley Weber (D-San Diego)
crystal.quezada@asm.ca.gov
(916) 319-2079

Jim Wood (D-Eureka)
tony.bui@asm.ca.gov
(916) 319-2002

###

Sample Message:

Dear Assemblymember,

I strongly oppose AB 2844. This bill remains a misguided, costly attempt to punish First Amendment-protected speech.

As long as the bill aims to punish or chill protected speech, no amendments will satisfy the concerns expressed by the Assembly Judiciary Committee analysis that its First Amendment concerns are “very serious and perhaps insurmountable.”   California should avoid the costly and unconstitutional minefield that AB 2844 will create. I urge you to shelve this bill.

AB 2844 would impose substantial burden and expense on state and local government:

  • It would require the Attorney General’s Office (AG) to investigate and continually monitor the many thousands of companies that contract or with the state or local public agencies, to discover whether they start or stop engaging in activity the bill seeks to deter.
  • The AG would have to maintain and publish a blacklist of such companies, notify those included, hear their appeals and defend the state in court if they sue — which is likely to happen, given how vague and confusing the criteria in AB 2844 are.
  • Every state and local government agency that contracts with private business for any purpose would have to disqualify low bidders that appear on the AG blacklist.
  • They would also have to seek out new partners when a contract with a blacklisted company ends – even if the company was performing well and its contract could have been renewed in a much simpler, less costly process.
  • The state would have to cover all such expenses incurred by local agencies.
  • The state would also have to pay for much more complex litigation when the constitutionality of AB 2844 is challenged.

Please leave international politics to the federal government and focus on California priorities. Thank you.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s